On 27/11/13 18:27, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 11/27/13 10:49, Yvan Roux wrote:
>>> How can that be correct?
>>>
>>> The secondary reload macros/hooks define cases where additional registers
>>> are needed to reload certain forms of rtl. I doubt the use of LRA
>>> completely eliminates the need for secon
On 27 November 2013 19:27, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 11/27/13 10:49, Yvan Roux wrote:
>>>
>>> How can that be correct?
>>>
>>> The secondary reload macros/hooks define cases where additional registers
>>> are needed to reload certain forms of rtl. I doubt the use of LRA
>>> completely eliminates the n
On 11/27/2013, 1:20 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/27/13 10:58, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
The secondary reload macros/hooks define cases where additional
registers are needed to reload certain forms of rtl. I doubt the use
of LRA completely eliminates the need for secondary reloads.
When I design
On 11/27/13 10:49, Yvan Roux wrote:
How can that be correct?
The secondary reload macros/hooks define cases where additional registers
are needed to reload certain forms of rtl. I doubt the use of LRA
completely eliminates the need for secondary reloads.
Vladimir explained me that in that cas
On 11/27/13 10:58, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
The secondary reload macros/hooks define cases where additional
registers are needed to reload certain forms of rtl. I doubt the use
of LRA completely eliminates the need for secondary reloads.
When I designed LRA I wanted to remove as many hooks a
On 27 November 2013 18:58, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> On 11/27/2013, 12:16 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>> On 11/27/13 03:18, Yvan Roux wrote:
>>>
>>> Ping
>>>
>>> On 18 November 2013 09:40, Yvan Roux wrote:
Ping.
On 7 November 2013 15:56, Yvan Roux wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
On 11/27/2013, 12:16 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/27/13 03:18, Yvan Roux wrote:
Ping
On 18 November 2013 09:40, Yvan Roux wrote:
Ping.
On 7 November 2013 15:56, Yvan Roux wrote:
Hi,
this patch fixed an LRA cycling due to secondary reload (Thumb mode).
Notice that this patch is a prerequisite
On 27/11/13 17:49, Yvan Roux wrote:
>> How can that be correct?
>>
>> The secondary reload macros/hooks define cases where additional registers
>> are needed to reload certain forms of rtl. I doubt the use of LRA
>> completely eliminates the need for secondary reloads.
>
> Vladimir explained me t
> How can that be correct?
>
> The secondary reload macros/hooks define cases where additional registers
> are needed to reload certain forms of rtl. I doubt the use of LRA
> completely eliminates the need for secondary reloads.
Vladimir explained me that in that case on arm, secondary reload hoo
On 11/27/13 03:18, Yvan Roux wrote:
Ping
On 18 November 2013 09:40, Yvan Roux wrote:
Ping.
On 7 November 2013 15:56, Yvan Roux wrote:
Hi,
this patch fixed an LRA cycling due to secondary reload (Thumb mode).
Notice that this patch is a prerequisite to turn on LRA by default on
ARM. Bootst
Ping
On 18 November 2013 09:40, Yvan Roux wrote:
> Ping.
>
> On 7 November 2013 15:56, Yvan Roux wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> this patch fixed an LRA cycling due to secondary reload (Thumb mode).
>> Notice that this patch is a prerequisite to turn on LRA by default on
>> ARM. Bootstrapped on a9 and a15
Ping.
On 7 November 2013 15:56, Yvan Roux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this patch fixed an LRA cycling due to secondary reload (Thumb mode).
> Notice that this patch is a prerequisite to turn on LRA by default on
> ARM. Bootstrapped on a9 and a15 without any regression in the
> testsuite as LRA is off by de
12 matches
Mail list logo
