On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:30 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 04/25/14 05:39, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Diego Novillo
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Please remember to send patches to gcc-patches.
>>>
>>> I'm wondering if you couldn't just use std::string here. No need to
>>>
On 04/25/14 05:39, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
Please remember to send patches to gcc-patches.
I'm wondering if you couldn't just use std::string here. No need to change
one complicated allocation scheme with another.
Since we were using c
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Trevor Saunders On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 05:09:57PM +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
>> > Please remember to send patches to gcc-patches.
>> >
>> > I'm wondering if you couldn't just use std::string here. N
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 05:09:57PM +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> > Please remember to send patches to gcc-patches.
> >
> > I'm wondering if you couldn't just use std::string here. No need to change
> > one complicated allocation scheme
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> Please remember to send patches to gcc-patches.
>
> I'm wondering if you couldn't just use std::string here. No need to change
> one complicated allocation scheme with another.
Since we were using c-styled strings throughout genmatch, I thou
