Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR120843, v3] Fix reject valid, because of inconformable coranks

2025-07-04 Thread Jerry D
On 7/2/25 4:12 PM, Jerry D wrote: On 7/2/25 9:40 AM, Jerry D wrote: On 7/2/25 3:14 AM, Andre Vehreschild wrote: Hi all, I successfully created a big mess with the previous patch. First of all by applying an outdated one and secondly by adding the conformance checks for coranks in a3f1cdd8ed46f

Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR120843, v3] Fix reject valid, because of inconformable coranks

2025-07-04 Thread Andre Vehreschild
Hi Jerry, that is very odd, because the test timeout in Opencoarrays is set to 300 seconds at the max. (There are even smaller ones). I can reproduce the Opencoarray tests hanging for cmake build-type Release. On a Debug build they fail. I just repeated testing against OpenCoarrays. The gcc-15 br

Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR120843, v3] Fix reject valid, because of inconformable coranks

2025-07-03 Thread Andre Vehreschild
Hi Jerry, thanks for the review and the ok. Committed as gcc-16-1967-g15413e05eb9. And special thanks for the kind words in the private mail you send me. It's very much appreciated that you even applied a translator to translate it to German. Thank you very much. I have set myself a reminder to

Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR120843, v3] Fix reject valid, because of inconformable coranks

2025-07-02 Thread Jerry D
On 7/2/25 9:40 AM, Jerry D wrote: On 7/2/25 3:14 AM, Andre Vehreschild wrote: Hi all, I successfully created a big mess with the previous patch. First of all by applying an outdated one and secondly by adding the conformance checks for coranks in a3f1cdd8ed46f9816b31ab162ae4dac547d34ebc. Checki

Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR120843, v3] Fix reject valid, because of inconformable coranks

2025-07-02 Thread Jerry D
On 7/2/25 3:14 AM, Andre Vehreschild wrote: Hi all, I successfully created a big mess with the previous patch. First of all by applying an outdated one and secondly by adding the conformance checks for coranks in a3f1cdd8ed46f9816b31ab162ae4dac547d34ebc. Checking the standard even using AI (haha

Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR120843, v3] Fix reject valid, because of inconformable coranks

2025-07-02 Thread Steve Kargl
On Wed, Jul 02, 2025 at 04:36:38AM -0700, Damian Rouson wrote: > git branch > gir checkout > git add > git commit > git rebase > git push > > It’s time to move beyond emailing patches! (Please.) I don't use git other than 'git clone', 'git reset --hard', and 'git diff'. If gfortran development

Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR120843, v3] Fix reject valid, because of inconformable coranks

2025-07-02 Thread Damian Rouson
git branch gir checkout git add git commit git rebase git push It’s time to move beyond emailing patches! (Please.) Damian On Wed, Jul 2, 2025 at 03:17 Andre Vehreschild wrote: > Hi all, > > I successfully created a big mess with the previous patch. First of all by > applying an outdated one

Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR120843, v3] Fix reject valid, because of inconformable coranks

2025-07-02 Thread Andre Vehreschild
Hi all, I successfully created a big mess with the previous patch. First of all by applying an outdated one and secondly by adding the conformance checks for coranks in a3f1cdd8ed46f9816b31ab162ae4dac547d34ebc. Checking the standard even using AI (haha) to figure if coranks of an expression have r