On 07/21/2015 09:58 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
What about applying something like my first patch with a comment that in
principle we would like to extend it carefully to more cases outside
template parameters?
OK, sure.
Jason
Hi,
On 07/21/2015 06:07 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 07/21/2015 09:02 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
I had a look and tried various things... Ultimately the issue is due to
the type_was_error_mark_node becomes integer_type_node trick in
grokdeclarator (which I don't like that much ;)
What happens if
On 07/21/2015 09:02 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
I had a look and tried various things... Ultimately the issue is due to
the type_was_error_mark_node becomes integer_type_node trick in
grokdeclarator (which I don't like that much ;)
What happens if we just remove that trick?
Jason
Hi again,
On 07/14/2015 05:43 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
On 07/14/2015 05:07 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 07/13/2015 09:41 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
+++ testsuite/g++.dg/template/crash81.C (working copy)
@@ -3,6 +3,6 @@
struct A
{
template struct X; // { dg-error "'T' has not been
de
Hi,
On 07/14/2015 05:07 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 07/13/2015 09:41 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
+++ testsuite/g++.dg/template/crash81.C (working copy)
@@ -3,6 +3,6 @@
struct A
{
template struct X; // { dg-error "'T' has not been
declared" "T" }
- // { dg-error "declaration of 'template
On 07/13/2015 09:41 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
+++ testsuite/g++.dg/template/crash81.C (working copy)
@@ -3,6 +3,6 @@
struct A
{
template struct X; // { dg-error "'T' has not been declared" "T" }
- // { dg-error "declaration of 'template struct A::X'" "A::X" { target
*-*-* } 5 }
- // { d
