On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 12:29:58AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> As the testcase shows, even when we've already reshaped the initializer, if
> it uses designated initializers and skips using those over others, we can
> have field != d->cur->index. The following patch handles that case.
Just to ve
OK.
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 7:29 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As the testcase shows, even when we've already reshaped the initializer, if
> it uses designated initializers and skips using those over others, we can
> have field != d->cur->index. The following patch handles that case.
>
> Bo
