On 08/02/2011 12:01 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> Didn't try it yet. Is that capable of fixing the runtime FAILs?
Apparently. I installed your simulator and get comparable results to
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-07/msg03632.html
r~
On 08/02/2011 12:01 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> == avrtest ==
>
> There is a text
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/avr-gcc-list/2011-06/msg00015.html
> and a README:
> http://winavr.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/winavr/avrtest/README?view=markup
>
> In the case there are questions: Ask.
Ah, a
In CCing Jörg.
Richard Henderson schrieb:
On 08/02/2011 12:52 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
There are still unrecognizables:
gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-7.c:56:1: error: unrecognizable insn:
(insn 17 14 18 3 (set (mem:SF (post_dec:HI (reg/f:HI 32 __SP_L__)) [0 S4 A8])
(reg:SF 43 [ f5.0
On 08/02/2011 12:52 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> There are still unrecognizables:
>
> gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-7.c:56:1: error: unrecognizable insn:
> (insn 17 14 18 3 (set (mem:SF (post_dec:HI (reg/f:HI 32 __SP_L__)) [0 S4 A8])
> (reg:SF 43 [ f5.0+4 ]))
> /mnt/nfs/home/georg/gnu/gcc
Richard Henderson wrote:
> Dang, forgot to add gcc-patches...
>
> Original Message
> Subject: [AVR] Fix PR49881
>
> The following iteration fixes the two regressions reported
> in comment 7 of the PR.
>
> These were ICEs due to emit_push_insn_single being "helpful"
> with pushi
