Re: [ARM] PR 47553: vld1q_lane_u8 & co. don't accept lanes >= 8

2011-03-28 Thread Richard Sandiford
Nick Clifton writes: > Hi Ramana, > >> I am tempted to consider this one for the other release branches since >> this is correcting a test in the interface for an intrinsic which has >> been wrong for a long time but would like the opinion of the other >> maintainers about this. > > I think that I

Re: [ARM] PR 47553: vld1q_lane_u8 & co. don't accept lanes >= 8

2011-03-17 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Ramana, I am tempted to consider this one for the other release branches since this is correcting a test in the interface for an intrinsic which has been wrong for a long time but would like the opinion of the other maintainers about this. I think that I would agree with you here. Certainl

Re: [ARM] PR 47553: vld1q_lane_u8 & co. don't accept lanes >= 8

2011-03-15 Thread Ramana Radhakrishnan
On 31/01/11 13:27, Richard Sandiford wrote: The v{ld,st}1q_lane_{u,s,p}8 intrinsic functions are supposed to take a range between 0 and 15. The function is then converted to a vld1 or vst1 of one half of the quad value. The problem is that the lane predicate doesn't account for this, and only a