Tobias Burnus wrote:
Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
I have tried to weaken the test by not using any target and using a
regexp
of the kind "(int|long)", but I did not succeeded.
Ups, I missed that Dominique's and Andreas' 32bit dumps are different
("unsigned int" vs. "character(kind=4)"). Thus,
Thanks Dominique and Andreas for reporting this issue.
Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
The test gfortran.dg/finalize_10.f90 fails in 32 bit mode [...]
The following patch fixes it
[...]
I have tried to weaken the test by not using any target and using a regexp
of the kind "(int|long)", but I did
Tobias Burnus writes:
> --- /dev/null 2013-06-06 09:52:08.544104880 +0200
> +++ gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/finalize_10.f90 2013-06-03
> 12:32:38.763008261 +0200
> @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
> +! { dg-do compile }
> +! { dg-options "-fdump-tree-original" }
> +!
> +! PR fortran/37336
> +!
> +! Finali
Dear Tobias,
The test gfortran.dg/finalize_10.f90 fails in 32 bit mode (see
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-06/msg00842.html
FAIL: gfortran.dg/finalize_10.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times original
"__builtin_memcpy ((void .) y->_data, (void .)
y->_vptr->_def_init, \\
Hello Mikael,
thanks for your patch reviews! Regarding your question:
Mikael Morin worte:
Le 06/06/2013 10:35, Tobias Burnus a écrit :
On May 31, 2013 18:39, Tobias Burnus wrote:
This patch adds finalization support for INTENT(out) for
nonallocatable dummy arguments.
Additionally, it address
Hello,
Le 06/06/2013 10:35, Tobias Burnus a écrit :
> * PING *
>
> Attached is a rediff - including the later posted additional test case
> (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-05/msg00141.html)
>
>
> On May 31, 2013 18:39, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>> This patch adds finalization support for INTENT(
