On 9 April 2013 18:47, Tom Tromey wrote:
>> "Jonathan" == Jonathan Wakely writes:
>
> Marc> I thought you were going to suggest enhancing the configure test
> Marc> so it fails on old systemtap (detects it as absent).
>
> Jonathan> Ah yes, that's a much better idea!
>
> Here's a patch to do th
> "Jonathan" == Jonathan Wakely writes:
Marc> I thought you were going to suggest enhancing the configure test
Marc> so it fails on old systemtap (detects it as absent).
Jonathan> Ah yes, that's a much better idea!
Here's a patch to do that.
I tested it on x86-64 Fedora 18. I tested the "
> "Jonathan" == Jonathan Wakely writes:
Jonathan> On 2 April 2013 16:39, Marc Glisse wrote:
>> On Tue, 2 Apr 2013, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>> Should we update the prerequisites documentation to say that if
>>> Systemtap is installed it needs to be at least version X?
>>
>>
>> I thought you
On 2 April 2013 16:39, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Apr 2013, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> Should we update the prerequisites documentation to say that if
>> Systemtap is installed it needs to be at least version X?
>
>
> I thought you were going to suggest enhancing the configure test so it fails
>
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 15 March 2013 08:55, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 08:32:02AM -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
2013-02-27 Tom Tromey
* libsupc++/unwind-cxx.h: Include sys/sdt.h if detected.
(PROBE2): New macro.
* libsupc++/eh_throw.cc
On 15 March 2013 08:55, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 08:32:02AM -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
>> 2013-02-27 Tom Tromey
>>
>> * libsupc++/unwind-cxx.h: Include sys/sdt.h if detected.
>> (PROBE2): New macro.
>> * libsupc++/eh_throw.cc (__cxa_throw, __cxa_rethrow): A
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 08:32:02AM -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
> 2013-02-27 Tom Tromey
>
> * libsupc++/unwind-cxx.h: Include sys/sdt.h if detected.
> (PROBE2): New macro.
> * libsupc++/eh_throw.cc (__cxa_throw, __cxa_rethrow): Add probe.
> * libsupc++/eh_catch.cc (__cxa_beg
Tom> 2013-02-27 Tom Tromey
Tom>* libsupc++/unwind-cxx.h: Include sys/sdt.h if detected.
Tom>(PROBE2): New macro.
Tom>* libsupc++/eh_throw.cc (__cxa_throw, __cxa_rethrow): Add probe.
Tom>* libsupc++/eh_catch.cc (__cxa_begin_catch): Add probe.
Tom>* configure.ac: Check for sys/
Dave> How did it build in the without sys/sdt.h case?
Sorry about that again.
I must have made some change after testing it.
Here is an updated version.
One thing I found out while fixing this up is that changes to
unwind-cxx.h do not cause anything to rebuild if I just run "make". I
have to
> "Dave" == Dave Korn writes:
Dave> How did it build in the without sys/sdt.h case?
Dave> Without HAVE_SYS_SDT_H, there's no definition of PROBE2 at all,
Dave> but you use it unconditionally in eh_{catch,throw}.cc. Am I
Dave> missing something?
Ugh. I must have made some mistake in my t
On 27/02/2013 21:52, Tom Tromey wrote:
> I'm posting this now to get reactions to the probe before cleaning up
> the corresponding gdb patches for submission. I've built it both with
> and without sys/sdt.h, but I haven't yet run the test suite.
How did it build in the without sys/sdt.h case?
I've been working a bit on improving exception-related features in gdb.
I had two goals which led to this particular patch.
First, I wanted to be able to implement type-name-based filtering for
"catch catch" and friends. (This feature was documented in the past,
but never implemented, and occasi
12 matches
Mail list logo
