On 01/08/2016 06:18 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
But it occurs to me that since the real problem I was trying to catch is
creation of temporaries of TREE_ADDRESSABLE type in the back end, we
should guard that instead. So this patch moves the as
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> But it occurs to me that since the real problem I was trying to catch is
>> creation of temporaries of TREE_ADDRESSABLE type in the back end, we
>> should guard that instead. So this patch moves the assert into assign_temp.
>
> FWIW create_t
> But it occurs to me that since the real problem I was trying to catch is
> creation of temporaries of TREE_ADDRESSABLE type in the back end, we
> should guard that instead. So this patch moves the assert into assign_temp.
FWIW create_tmp_var has a slightly stronger version:
gcc_assert (!TREE
This testcase was broken by my earlier fix for 67557, which added an
assert to store_field to catch inappropriate use of bitwise copying of
TREE_ADDRESSABLE types. In this testcase, the copying is actually fine,
since no temporary object is created. So one solution would be to
recognize that
