> The problem appears to be that GCC will create a multiply-plus-add
> instruction to access the table regardless of whether the backend
> supports such an instruction. I could not work out where in the
> middle end this was occurring, so instead I created the patch below
> which contai
Hi DJ,
Compiling this test case with the RL78 toolchain results in an ICE:
unsigned char g_X;
unsigned char g_Y;
const __far unsigned char TabA[2][2] = { { 3, 0 }, { 4, 5 } };
void main (void) { g_X = 1; g_Y = TabA[g_X][g_X]; }
The problem appears to be that GCC will create a
