Re: RFA: PR 68770: Fix use of uninitialised value in secondary_reload

2016-01-05 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Jeff, PR target/68770 * ira-costs.c (copy_cost): Initialise the t_code field of the sri structure. Can you please reduce the testcase from the BZ so that it can be included in the testsuite? I realize it might take a long time with multidelta because of the need to run the com

Re: RFA: PR 68770: Fix use of uninitialised value in secondary_reload

2016-01-02 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
On 2016.01.01 at 22:33 -0700, Jeff Law wrote: > On 12/22/2015 03:04 AM, Nick Clifton wrote: > >Hi Guys, > > > > The patch below fixes PR 68770 - a warning from valgrind about an > > uninitialised value being used in the default_secondary_reload. The > > problem turns out to the in copy_costs

Re: RFA: PR 68770: Fix use of uninitialised value in secondary_reload

2016-01-01 Thread Jeff Law
On 12/22/2015 03:04 AM, Nick Clifton wrote: Hi Guys, The patch below fixes PR 68770 - a warning from valgrind about an uninitialised value being used in the default_secondary_reload. The problem turns out to the in copy_costs which creates its own secondary reload information struct

RFA: PR 68770: Fix use of uninitialised value in secondary_reload

2015-12-22 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Guys, The patch below fixes PR 68770 - a warning from valgrind about an uninitialised value being used in the default_secondary_reload. The problem turns out to the in copy_costs which creates its own secondary reload information structure, but it does not initialise all of the field