Re: RFA: MN10300: Call default_encode_section_info

2012-07-25 Thread Richard Henderson
On 07/05/2012 07:29 AM, Nick Clifton wrote: > static void > -mn10300_encode_section_info (tree decl, rtx rtl, int first ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED) > +mn10300_encode_section_info (tree decl, rtx rtl, int first) > { >rtx symbol; > > @@ -2480,6 +2488,8 @@ > >if (flag_pic) > SYMBOL_REF_FLAG (

Re: RFA: MN10300: Call default_encode_section_info

2012-07-06 Thread nick clifton
Hi Jeff, Thanks - patch committed. I decided that it would be best to call default_encode_section_info first, just in case it turns out to be important one day. Cheers Nick

Re: RFA: MN10300: Call default_encode_section_info

2012-07-05 Thread Jeff Law
On 07/05/2012 08:29 AM, Nick Clifton wrote: Hi Jeff, Hi Alex, This may count as an obvious fix, but I felt that I ought to check, just in case... Currently mn10300_encode_section_info() does not call default_encode_section_info(). This means that it misses out on possibly setting s

RFA: MN10300: Call default_encode_section_info

2012-07-05 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Jeff, Hi Alex, This may count as an obvious fix, but I felt that I ought to check, just in case... Currently mn10300_encode_section_info() does not call default_encode_section_info(). This means that it misses out on possibly setting some important flags in the symbol, such as SYMBO