Hi Jeff,
The point of the patch is that the cmpstrnsi machine pattern should
not be used to implement the memcmp builtin function. This is
because a string comparison will terminate if two zero bytes are read
whereas a memory comparison should continue.
OK. Kindof surprised this wasn't deal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/10/11 09:49, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> This is a resend of a previously submitted patch:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg00363.html
>
> This version of the patch has been adjusted to apply to today's
> sources, but ot
Hi Guys,
This is a resend of a previously submitted patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg00363.html
This version of the patch has been adjusted to apply to today's sources,
but otherwise it remains the same.
The point of the patch is that the cmpstrnsi machine pattern should no
