By the way, the "compile" subset of the testsuite works for pdp11; it has some
errors which still need cleanup but a large fraction works.
paul
-Original Message-
From: Steven Bosscher [mailto:stevenb@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 5:09 PM
To: Koning, Paul; GCC
These look fine. I'll defer to others on whether it should wait to Phase 1.
I had tried to make divmod work but never figured out the reason why it did
not. Thanks for answering that question.
As for the subregs that Richard commented on -- I will gladly admit that this
target isn't all clean
On 02/14/2012 03:41 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Not sure why this was changed. What I'd like to do, is remove the
> divhi3 and movhi3 define_expand and define_insn, and just keep
> divmodhi4. You point to s390. I suppose you mean the divmoddi4
> expander there?
Yes. Naturally the TImode stuff be
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 02/14/2012 02:08 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
>> OK for trunk?
>
> This can wait for stage1.
>
>> +;; On PDP-11, DIV always produces a quotient and a remainder. But CSE
>> +;; cannot optimize the divmods away because the SET_DESTs are
On 02/14/2012 02:08 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> OK for trunk?
This can wait for stage1.
> +;; On PDP-11, DIV always produces a quotient and a remainder. But CSE
> +;; cannot optimize the divmods away because the SET_DESTs are SUBREGs.
> +;
> ;(define_expand "divmodhi4"
> ; [(parallel [(set (
