Re: [PING] 3 patches waiting for approval/review

2013-12-04 Thread Andreas Krebbel
Hi Jeff, to my understanding a leaf function is characterized by not calling another function in its function body. So for the patch the question is whether we consider the mcount call belonging to the function body or not. As I see it from the backends for all uses of is_leaf the function body

Re: [PING] 3 patches waiting for approval/review

2013-10-22 Thread Andreas Krebbel
On 16/10/13 22:25, Jeff Law wrote: > On 10/11/13 11:23, Andreas Krebbel wrote: >> On 10/10/13 18:41, Jeff Law wrote: >>> On 10/10/13 04:00, Andreas Krebbel wrote: On 09/10/13 21:46, Jeff Law wrote: > On 08/21/13 03:21, Andreas Krebbel wrote: >> [RFC] Allow functions calling mcount befo

Re: [PING] 3 patches waiting for approval/review

2013-10-16 Thread Jeff Law
On 10/11/13 11:23, Andreas Krebbel wrote: On 10/10/13 18:41, Jeff Law wrote: On 10/10/13 04:00, Andreas Krebbel wrote: On 09/10/13 21:46, Jeff Law wrote: On 08/21/13 03:21, Andreas Krebbel wrote: [RFC] Allow functions calling mcount before prologue to be leaf functions http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/g

Re: [PING] 3 patches waiting for approval/review

2013-10-11 Thread Andreas Krebbel
On 10/10/13 18:41, Jeff Law wrote: > On 10/10/13 04:00, Andreas Krebbel wrote: >> On 09/10/13 21:46, Jeff Law wrote: >>> On 08/21/13 03:21, Andreas Krebbel wrote: [RFC] Allow functions calling mcount before prologue to be leaf functions http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg00993.h

Re: [PING] 3 patches waiting for approval/review

2013-10-10 Thread Andreas Krebbel
On 10/10/13 18:41, Jeff Law wrote: > On 10/10/13 04:00, Andreas Krebbel wrote: >> On 09/10/13 21:46, Jeff Law wrote: >>> On 08/21/13 03:21, Andreas Krebbel wrote: [RFC] Allow functions calling mcount before prologue to be leaf functions http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg00993.h

Re: [PING] 3 patches waiting for approval/review

2013-10-10 Thread Jeff Law
On 10/10/13 04:00, Andreas Krebbel wrote: On 09/10/13 21:46, Jeff Law wrote: On 08/21/13 03:21, Andreas Krebbel wrote: [RFC] Allow functions calling mcount before prologue to be leaf functions http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg00993.html I don't think this is necessarily correct for

Re: [PING] 3 patches waiting for approval/review

2013-10-10 Thread Andreas Krebbel
On 09/10/13 21:46, Jeff Law wrote: > On 08/21/13 03:21, Andreas Krebbel wrote: >> [RFC] Allow functions calling mcount before prologue to be leaf functions >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg00993.html > I don't think this is necessarily correct for all targets. ISTM the > ability to

Re: [PING] 3 patches waiting for approval/review

2013-10-09 Thread Jeff Law
On 08/21/13 03:21, Andreas Krebbel wrote: [RFC] Allow functions calling mcount before prologue to be leaf functions http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg00993.html I don't think this is necessarily correct for all targets. ISTM the ability to consider a function calling mcount as a leaf

Re: [PING] 3 patches waiting for approval/review

2013-10-02 Thread Andreas Krebbel
On 02/10/13 09:10, Paulo Matos wrote: > >> -Original Message- >> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On >> Behalf Of Andreas Krebbel >> Sent: 01 October 2013 10:18 >> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org >> Subject: [PING] 3 patches waiting for approval/review

RE: [PING] 3 patches waiting for approval/review

2013-10-02 Thread Paulo Matos
> -Original Message- > From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On > Behalf Of Andreas Krebbel > Sent: 01 October 2013 10:18 > To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: [PING] 3 patches waiting for approval/review > > [RFC] Allow functions calling mcount bef