Re: [PING] [PATCH, PR 57748] Check for out of bounds access, Part 2

2013-12-02 Thread Jeff Law
On 11/28/13 03:24, Bernd Edlinger wrote: Hi, On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 12:07:16, Jeff Law wrote: On 11/27/13 05:29, Bernd Edlinger wrote: Hi, ping... this patch still open: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg02291.html Note: it does, as it is, _not_ depend on the keep_aligning patch. A

RE: [PING] [PATCH, PR 57748] Check for out of bounds access, Part 2

2013-11-28 Thread Bernd Edlinger
Hi, On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 12:07:16, Jeff Law wrote: > > On 11/27/13 05:29, Bernd Edlinger wrote: >> Hi, >> >> ping... >> >> this patch still open: >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg02291.html >> >> Note: it does, as it is, _not_ depend on the keep_aligning patch. >> And it would fix s

Re: [PING] [PATCH, PR 57748] Check for out of bounds access, Part 2

2013-11-27 Thread Jeff Law
On 11/27/13 05:29, Bernd Edlinger wrote: Hi, ping... this patch still open: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg02291.html Note: it does, as it is, _not_ depend on the keep_aligning patch. And it would fix some really nasty wrong code generation issues. Is there a testcase for this p

Re: [PING] [PATCH, PR 57748] Check for out of bounds access, Part 2

2013-11-27 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote: > Hi, > > ping... > > this patch still open: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg02291.html > > Note: it does, as it is, _not_ depend on the keep_aligning patch. > And it would fix some really nasty wrong code generation issues. I'll