From: Richard Earnshaw
Sent: 17 October 2012 11:14
To: Greta Yorsh
Cc: GCC Patches; Ramana Radhakrishnan; ni...@redhat.com;
p...@codesourcery.com
Subject: Re: [PING][Patch, ARM] cleanup prologue_use pattern
On 17/10/12 11:08, Greta Yorsh wrote:
Ping!
I've been pondering why this was being
Greta Yorsh
Cc: GCC Patches; Ramana Radhakrishnan; ni...@redhat.com;
p...@codesourcery.com
Subject: Re: [PING][Patch, ARM] cleanup prologue_use pattern
On 17/10/12 11:08, Greta Yorsh wrote:
> Ping!
>
I've been pondering why this was being asked for. As far as I can tell
it's just a
On 17/10/12 11:08, Greta Yorsh wrote:
Ping!
I've been pondering why this was being asked for. As far as I can tell
it's just a naming issue (mention of the epilogue in the prologue).
The right thing to do is to rename the pattern to reflect the dual use
rather than add additional patterns
