is true currently.
Pan
-Original Message-
From: Li, Pan2
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2024 10:38 PM
To: Robin Dapp ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; kito.ch...@gmail.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1] Revert "RISC-V: Support highpart register overlap for
vwcvt"
> Just n
in Dapp
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2024 10:12 PM
To: Li, Pan2 ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: rdapp@gmail.com; juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; kito.ch...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Revert "RISC-V: Support highpart register overlap for
vwcvt"
> (define_insn "@pred_vwsll_scalar
> (define_insn "@pred_vwsll_scalar"
> - [(set (match_operand:VWEXTI 0 "register_operand" "=vd, vr, vd, vr, vd, vr,
> vd, vr, vd, vr, vd, vr, ?&vr, ?&vr")
> + [(set (match_operand:VWEXTI 0 "register_operand" "=vr, vr")
Just noticed, not a problem of the revert but wasn't that wrong before
without
Committed, thanks Kito.
Pan
-Original Message-
From: Kito Cheng
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2024 9:11 PM
To: Li, Pan2
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; rdapp@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Revert "RISC-V: Support highpart register overlap for
vwcvt&q
LGTM, thanks Pan, although the revert patch series look a little bit
scary, but I believe it's the safest way for now since we don't really
fully understand how register filters work, and it's not really good
timing to figure out all the detail around that.
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 9:02 PM Li, Pan2
Request review as this revert patch contains some manually resolved conflict
changes.
Passed the rv64gcv fully regression test with isl build.
Pan
-Original Message-
From: Li, Pan2
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2024 8:59 PM
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; kito.ch...
