On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 08:27:47PM +, Paulo Matos wrote:
>> Yes, it looks strange but it was the way we came up with to
>> implement an instruction that loads from a pair of addresses.
>>
>> From what I wrote previously to Richard.
>> "We
On 30/01/14 20:47, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 08:27:47PM +, Paulo Matos wrote:
Yes, it looks strange but it was the way we came up with to
implement an instruction that loads from a pair of addresses.
From what I wrote previously to Richard.
"We have an instruction that l
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 08:27:47PM +, Paulo Matos wrote:
> Yes, it looks strange but it was the way we came up with to
> implement an instruction that loads from a pair of addresses.
>
> From what I wrote previously to Richard.
> "We have an instruction that loads two 32 bit values into a lowe
On 30/01/14 17:10, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Right, in the context:
Just in case: the point I was trying to make in the second paragraph
was that the code in the patch only triggers (as you say) because the
address isn't seen as mode-dependent. But this kind of address does
look mod
On 30/01/14 14:01, Richard Biener wrote:
I'm curious on where you are seeing MEMs with a vector mode address.
What does that MEM even mean?
Yes, it looks strange but it was the way we came up with to implement an
instruction that loads from a pair of addresses.
From what I wrote previously
Paulo Matos writes:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Richard Sandiford [mailto:rdsandif...@googlemail.com]
>> Sent: 30 January 2014 12:43
>> To: Paulo Matos
>> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Vector mode addresses
>>
>>
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Paulo Matos wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Richard Sandiford [mailto:rdsandif...@googlemail.com]
>> Sent: 30 January 2014 12:43
>> To: Paulo Matos
>> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Vector mode
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Sandiford [mailto:rdsandif...@googlemail.com]
> Sent: 30 January 2014 12:43
> To: Paulo Matos
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Vector mode addresses
>
> Paulo Matos writes:
> > As a followup of the thr
Paulo Matos writes:
> As a followup of the thread:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2014-01/msg00206.html
>
> consider the attached patch for submission. It fixes an ICE in case
> you try to use vector mode addresses and do not have it as mode
> dependent target hook. As discussed in the thread adding
