...@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, i386]: Fix PR51109, symbol size in scheduler state machine
is reduced
On 10/10/2012 01:00 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> I have removed the extra line as obvious in SVN, to allow my
> bootstraps to continue.
Thanks!
Paolo.
On 10/10/2012 01:00 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
I have removed the extra line as obvious in SVN, to allow my
bootstraps to continue.
Thanks!
Paolo.
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:57:09PM +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> On 10/10/2012 12:53 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >Yeah, clearly a different version of the patch has been posted
> >vs. what has been checked in. The difference is removal of the
> >(define_cpu_unit "bdver1-mult" "bdver1_mult")
> >line
Hi,
On 10/10/2012 12:53 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Yeah, clearly a different version of the patch has been posted
vs. what has been checked in. The difference is removal of the
(define_cpu_unit "bdver1-mult" "bdver1_mult")
line (present in the posted patch, not in the checked in patch).
Also, th
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:29:04PM +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/03/2012 11:57 AM, Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh wrote:
> >Testing was done before posting the patch. It was successful.
> This change is now in:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2012-10/msg00418.html
>
> and it looks
Hi,
On 10/03/2012 11:57 AM, Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh wrote:
Testing was done before posting the patch. It was successful.
This change is now in:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2012-10/msg00418.html
and it looks like is breaking the build for me:
build/genattrtab
/scratch/Gcc/svn-dir
, symbol size in scheduler state machine
is reduced
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh
wrote:
> This is a fix for PR 51109.
>
> There are three changes
>
> 1. Microcoded instructions are considered as single issue instructions
> and are therefore is
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh
wrote:
> This is a fix for PR 51109.
>
> There are three changes
>
> 1. Microcoded instructions are considered as single issue instructions
> and are therefore issued to a separate execution unit.
> 2. The multiplier unit is a