On 2013-05-30 04:32, Ian Bolton wrote:
On 05/20/2013 11:55 AM, Ian Bolton wrote:
> >I improved this patch during the work I did on the recent insv_imm
>patch
> >(http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-05/msg01007.html).
>
>Thanks, you cleaned up almost everything on which I would have
>commen
> On 05/20/2013 11:55 AM, Ian Bolton wrote:
> > I improved this patch during the work I did on the recent insv_imm
> patch
> > (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-05/msg01007.html).
>
> Thanks, you cleaned up almost everything on which I would have
> commented
> with the previous patch revisio
On 05/20/2013 11:55 AM, Ian Bolton wrote:
> I improved this patch during the work I did on the recent insv_imm patch
> (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-05/msg01007.html).
Thanks, you cleaned up almost everything on which I would have commented
with the previous patch revision. The only thi
> Hi,
>
> This patch implements the BFI variant of BFM. In doing so, it also
> implements the insv standard pattern.
>
> I've regression tested on bare-metal and linux.
>
> It comes complete with its own compilation and execution testcase.
>
> OK for trunk?
>
> Cheers,
> Ian
>
>
> 2013-05-0
