On 10/7/20 5:12 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 3:09 PM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>> Adding the testcase...
>>
>> On 10/7/20 4:08 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>>> On 9/17/20 1:03 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>> [ ... Big snip, starting over ... ]
>>>
>>> I may have not explained things t
On 10/7/20 5:12 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 3:09 PM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>> Adding the testcase...
>>
>> On 10/7/20 4:08 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>>> On 9/17/20 1:03 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>> [ ... Big snip, starting over ... ]
>>>
>>> I may have not explained things t
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 3:09 PM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> Adding the testcase...
>
> On 10/7/20 4:08 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> > On 9/17/20 1:03 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > [ ... Big snip, starting over ... ]
> >
> > I may have not explained things too well. So I've put together a small
> >
Adding the testcase...
On 10/7/20 4:08 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 9/17/20 1:03 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> [ ... Big snip, starting over ... ]
>
> I may have not explained things too well. So I've put together a small
> example that folks can play with to show the underlying issue.
>
>
> There's a s
On 9/17/20 1:03 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
[ ... Big snip, starting over ... ]
I may have not explained things too well. So I've put together a small
example that folks can play with to show the underlying issue.
There's a static library libfu.a. In this static library we have a hunk
of local
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 12:18:40PM -0600, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote:
> >> In an LTO world the TU isn't indivisible anymore. LTO will happily
> >> discard things which don't appear to be used. So parts of the TU may
> >> be in the main program, other parts may be in DSOs used by the main
> >
On 9/17/20 1:04 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:24 PM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>>
>> On 9/16/20 11:52 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
>>> On Wed, 16 Sep 2020, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>>
ISTM this is a lot like the problem we have where we inline functions
>>>
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:24 PM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
>
> On 9/16/20 11:52 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Sep 2020, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote:
> >
> >> ISTM this is a lot like the problem we have where we inline functions
> >> with static data. To fix those we use STB_G
On 9/16/20 11:52 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Sep 2020, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
>> ISTM this is a lot like the problem we have where we inline functions
>> with static data. To fix those we use STB_GNU_UNIQUE. But I don't see
>> any code in the C front-end which would utilize
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote:
> ISTM this is a lot like the problem we have where we inline functions
> with static data. To fix those we use STB_GNU_UNIQUE. But I don't see
> any code in the C front-end which would utilize STB_GNU_UNIQUE. It's
> support seems limited to
On 9/16/20 11:32 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:24 AM Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>> On 9/16/20 11:13 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:10 AM Jeff Law wrote:
On 9/16/20 11:05 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 9:53 AM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
> wro
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:24 AM Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
> On 9/16/20 11:13 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:10 AM Jeff Law wrote:
> >>
> >> On 9/16/20 11:05 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 9:53 AM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
> >>> wrote:
> Consider a TU with file
On 9/16/20 11:13 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:10 AM Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>> On 9/16/20 11:05 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 9:53 AM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
>>> wrote:
Consider a TU with file scoped "static const object utf8_sb_map". A
routine within
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:10 AM Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
> On 9/16/20 11:05 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 9:53 AM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Consider a TU with file scoped "static const object utf8_sb_map". A
> >> routine within the TU will stuff &utf8_sb_map int
On 9/16/20 11:05 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 9:53 AM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>>
>> Consider a TU with file scoped "static const object utf8_sb_map". A
>> routine within the TU will stuff &utf8_sb_map into an object, something
>> like:
>>
>> fu (...)
>>
>> {
>>
>> if
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 9:53 AM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
>
> Consider a TU with file scoped "static const object utf8_sb_map". A
> routine within the TU will stuff &utf8_sb_map into an object, something
> like:
>
> fu (...)
>
> {
>
> if (cond)
>
> dfa->sb_char = utf8_sb_map;
>
>
Consider a TU with file scoped "static const object utf8_sb_map". A
routine within the TU will stuff &utf8_sb_map into an object, something
like:
fu (...)
{
if (cond)
dfa->sb_char = utf8_sb_map;
else
dfa->sb_char = malloc (...);
}
There is another routine in the TU which loo
17 matches
Mail list logo
