Hi Steve,
Committed as r241995. Thanks.
Paul
On 8 November 2016 at 20:43, Steve Kargl
wrote:
> Yes. I saw Ian's analysis in c.l.f. It seems we both got
> caught out on this one. The patch looks fine.
>
> --
> steve
>
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 08:26:37PM +0100, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
>> H
Yes. I saw Ian's analysis in c.l.f. It seems we both got
caught out on this one. The patch looks fine.
--
steve
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 08:26:37PM +0100, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> I moved too quickly and caused a regression. See the link in the
> testcase. The attached fixes
Hi Steve,
I moved too quickly and caused a regression. See the link in the
testcase. The attached fixes the problem and bootstraps/regtests.
OK for trunk?
Paul
On 5 November 2016 at 16:17, Steve Kargl
wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 10:05:30AM +0100, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
>>
>> Bootstra
On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 10:05:30AM +0100, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
>
> Bootstraps and regtests on FC21/x86_64 - OK for trunk?
OK with minor nit (see below).
>
> + /* F2003 12.4.1.7 */
> + if (to->expr_type == EXPR_VARIABLE && from->expr_type ==EXPR_VARIABLE
Need a space after ==.
--
Dear All,
This patch introduces an error if the to and from arguments of
move_alloc contain the same object or its subobjects. Please see the
comment in the testcase for an explanation and the link to the clf
discussion.
Bootstraps and regtests on FC21/x86_64 - OK for trunk?
Paul
2016-11-05 Pa
