Re: 2nd Ping: Re: [PATCH v3] doc: Document order of define_peephole2 scanning

2023-05-04 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 2:10 AM Hans-Peter Nilsson via Gcc-patches wrote: > > Ping again. OK. > > From: Hans-Peter Nilsson > > Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 01:55:24 +0200 > > > > > From: Hans-Peter Nilsson > > > Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 18:59:14 +0200 > > [...] > > > > > So again: Approvers: pdf output

2nd Ping: Re: [PATCH v3] doc: Document order of define_peephole2 scanning

2023-05-03 Thread Hans-Peter Nilsson via Gcc-patches
Ping again. > From: Hans-Peter Nilsson > Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 01:55:24 +0200 > > > From: Hans-Peter Nilsson > > Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 18:59:14 +0200 > [...] > > > So again: Approvers: pdf output reviewed. Ok to commit? > > -- >8 -- > > I was a bit surprised when my newly-added define_peeph

Ping: Re: [PATCH v3] doc: Document order of define_peephole2 scanning

2023-04-26 Thread Hans-Peter Nilsson via Gcc-patches
> From: Hans-Peter Nilsson > Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 18:59:14 +0200 [...] > So again: Approvers: pdf output reviewed. Ok to commit? > -- >8 -- > I was a bit surprised when my newly-added define_peephole2 didn't > match, but it was because it was expected to partially match the > generated output