Hi,
On Thu, Apr 26 2018, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi Martin!
>
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 15:56:26 +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 19 2018, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>> > * testsuite/libgomp.oacc-fortran/error_stop-1.f: New file.
>> > * testsuite/libgomp.oacc-fortran/er
Hi Martin!
On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 15:56:26 +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19 2018, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > * testsuite/libgomp.oacc-fortran/error_stop-1.f: New file.
> > * testsuite/libgomp.oacc-fortran/error_stop-2.f: Likewise.
> > * testsuite/libgo
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 19 2018, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>
> Per PR85463 '[nvptx] "exit" in offloaded region doesn't terminate
> process' that I just filed, we currently have to use "abort" instead of
> "exit" for nvptx offloading, so I have applied
Am 19.04.2018 um 13:59 schrieb Thomas Schwinge:
The Fortran standard does not apply in this case. What does the OpenACC
standard say about STOP in an offloaded region?
Nothing explicitly, as far as I know. ;-/ Which means, that this either
a) has to be forbidden, or b) some common sense impleme
Hi!
On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 13:32:16 +0200, Thomas König wrote:
> > Mapping exit to abort is weird,
>
> For Fortran, this is mapping STOP with a numeric code to abort.
>
> The Fortran standard does not apply in this case. What does the OpenACC
> standard say about STOP in an offloaded region?
Noth
> Mapping exit to abort is weird,
For Fortran, this is mapping STOP with a numeric code to abort.
The Fortran standard does not apply in this case. What does the OpenACC
standard say about STOP in an offloaded region?
Regards, Thomas
Hi!
On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 11:25:30 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:19:31AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 11:14:38 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:06:18AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 4 Apr 2018 11:30:34
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:19:31AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 11:14:38 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:06:18AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > > On Wed, 4 Apr 2018 11:30:34 +0200, Thomas König wrote:
> > > > the recent patch to make t
Hi!
On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 11:14:38 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:06:18AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > On Wed, 4 Apr 2018 11:30:34 +0200, Thomas König wrote:
> > > the recent patch to make the gfortran and libgomp testsuites more
> > > standard conforming, by replaci
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:06:18AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, 4 Apr 2018 11:30:34 +0200, Thomas König wrote:
> > the recent patch to make the gfortran and libgomp testsuites more
> > standard conforming, by replacing CALL ABORT() with STOP N, led
> > to numerous testsuite fai
promptly
addressing the issue raised!)
> --- runtime/minimal.c (Revision 259055)
> +++ runtime/minimal.c (Arbeitskopie)
> +void
> +stop_numeric (int code, bool quiet)
> +{
> + if (!quiet)
> +printf ("STOP %d\n", code);
> +
> + exit (code);
> +}
Per PR85463
11 matches
Mail list logo