On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 4:11 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Easwaran Raman wrote:
>>> On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 4:46 AM, Richard Biener
>>> wrote:
Easwaran Raman wrote:
>In that case, if my i
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Easwaran Raman wrote:
>> On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 4:46 AM, Richard Biener
>> wrote:
>>> Easwaran Raman wrote:
>>>
In that case, if my insert_stmt immediately follows dep_stmt and both
have the same
This addresses the case where UID alone is not sufficient to figure
>>>>> out which statement appears earlier in a BB. Bootstraps and no test
>>>>> regressions in x86_64 on linux. Ok for trunk?
>>>>
>>>> Why not simply conservatively u
where UID alone is not sufficient to figure
>>>> out which statement appears earlier in a BB. Bootstraps and no test
>>>> regressions in x86_64 on linux. Ok for trunk?
>>>
>>> Why not simply conservatively use gimple_uid (a) <= gimple_uid (b)
>>&g
>> in not_dominated_by?
>>
>> Richard.
>>
>>
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Easwaran
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013-05-23 Easwaran Raman
>>>
>>> PR tree-optimization/57337
>>> * tree-ssa-reassoc.c (appears_late
(a) <= gimple_uid (b)
> in not_dominated_by?
>
> Richard.
>
>
>
>> Thanks,
>> Easwaran
>>
>>
>> 2013-05-23 Easwaran Raman
>>
>> PR tree-optimization/57337
>> * tree-ssa-reassoc.c (appears_later_in_bb): New function.
>> (find_inse
le_uid (a) <= gimple_uid (b)
in not_dominated_by?
Richard.
> Thanks,
> Easwaran
>
>
> 2013-05-23 Easwaran Raman
>
> PR tree-optimization/57337
> * tree-ssa-reassoc.c (appears_later_in_bb): New function.
> (find_insert_point): Correctly identify the insertion point
>
This addresses the case where UID alone is not sufficient to figure
out which statement appears earlier in a BB. Bootstraps and no test
regressions in x86_64 on linux. Ok for trunk?
Thanks,
Easwaran
2013-05-23 Easwaran Raman
PR tree-optimization/57337
* tree-ssa-reassoc.c
