Re: PR translation/80280

2017-05-09 Thread Martin Sebor
On 05/09/2017 09:33 AM, Nick Clifton wrote: Hi Martin, Rats! I ran into this when building for sparcv9-solaris2.11 but didn't look at the cause of the error carefully enough to recognize it was caused by my change so I just raised 80673 for it. It didn't occur to me that targets defined their

Re: PR translation/80280

2017-05-09 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Martin, > Rats! I ran into this when building for sparcv9-solaris2.11 but > didn't look at the cause of the error carefully enough to recognize > it was caused by my change so I just raised 80673 for it. It didn't > occur to me that targets defined their own format extensions like > this. W

Re: PR translation/80280

2017-05-09 Thread Martin Sebor
On 05/09/2017 09:08 AM, Nick Clifton wrote: Hi Martin, I am currently unable to build gcc for the x86_64-pc-cygwin target because gcc/config/i386/msformat-c.c uses the format_flag_spec struct but it has not been updated with the new field. :-( For example: gcc/config/i386/msformat-c.

Re: PR translation/80280

2017-05-09 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Martin, I am currently unable to build gcc for the x86_64-pc-cygwin target because gcc/config/i386/msformat-c.c uses the format_flag_spec struct but it has not been updated with the new field. :-( For example: gcc/config/i386/msformat-c.c gcc/config/i386/msformat-c.c:52:1: error