On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 9:37 AM Roger Sayle wrote:
>
>
> This patch is a partial solution to PR target/107671, updating Uros'
> patch from comment #4, to catch both bit set (setc) and bit not set
> (setnc) cases from the code in comment #2, when compiled on x86_64.
> Unfortunately, this is a partia
This patch is a partial solution to PR target/107671, updating Uros'
patch from comment #4, to catch both bit set (setc) and bit not set
(setnc) cases from the code in comment #2, when compiled on x86_64.
Unfortunately, this is a partial solution, as the pointer variants
in comment #1, aren't yet
