On Tue, 18 Dec 2012, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> On 12/12/12 03:33, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Dec 2012, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> > > 4. Type checking as part of a `for' initializer segfaults on g++ 3.2:
> > >
> > > for (type = TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (blah); )
> > >
> > > The only reas
On 12/12/12 03:33, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
4. Type checking as part of a `for' initializer segfaults on g++ 3.2:
for (type = TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (blah); )
The only reasonable thing I could think of, was disabling the tree
checking code
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2012, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:21 AM, Steven Bosscher
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 6:07 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>> >> I don't know how much of this is a fool's errand, and if we want t
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012, Teresa Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:21 AM, Steven Bosscher
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 6:07 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> >> I don't know how much of this is a fool's errand, and if we want to commit
> >> to supporting < GCC 3.4, but your patch suggested
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:21 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 6:07 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>> I don't know how much of this is a fool's errand, and if we want to commit
>> to supporting < GCC 3.4, but your patch suggested c++98, and GCC 3.2 claims
>> such.
>
> GCC 3.2 claims
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 6:07 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> I don't know how much of this is a fool's errand, and if we want to commit
> to supporting < GCC 3.4, but your patch suggested c++98, and GCC 3.2 claims
> such.
GCC 3.2 claims many things, but any GCC that has the old C++ parser
has known no
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> Hi Richard.
>
> Your last patch for this PR suggested we verify our assumptions wrt a least
> common C++ compiler to build trunk with. Since I already had the offended
> system at hand (Red Hat Linux 8.0), I decided to investigate a bit further.
>
>
Hi Richard.
Your last patch for this PR suggested we verify our assumptions wrt a
least common C++ compiler to build trunk with. Since I already had the
offended system at hand (Red Hat Linux 8.0), I decided to investigate a
bit further.
g++ 3.4 builds trunk just fine, but anything prior to
