On 07/20/11 13:24, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Sandra Loosemore writes:
>> I've been experimenting with a patch that adds a new define_peephole2
>> for MIPS. It was blowing up with a segfault in insn-recog.c while
>> building libstdc++, and looking at the generated code for my new pattern
>> th
Sandra Loosemore writes:
> I've been experimenting with a patch that adds a new define_peephole2
> for MIPS. It was blowing up with a segfault in insn-recog.c while
> building libstdc++, and looking at the generated code for my new pattern
> there was clearly a bad offset being passed to peep2
I've been experimenting with a patch that adds a new define_peephole2
for MIPS. It was blowing up with a segfault in insn-recog.c while
building libstdc++, and looking at the generated code for my new pattern
there was clearly a bad offset being passed to peep2_next_insn. I
tracked it down to
