Re: PING PATCH: Assert DWARF register size <= saved reg size

2012-03-13 Thread Jason Merrill
Ok. Jason

Re: PING PATCH: Assert DWARF register size <= saved reg size

2012-03-11 Thread H.J. Lu
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 12:42 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 11:04 AM, H.J. Lu wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am working on 32bit Pmode for x32: >> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50797 >> >> It removes all LEAs, which convert 32bit address to 64bit, and uses 0x67 >> address pr

PING PATCH: Assert DWARF register size <= saved reg size

2012-03-02 Thread H.J. Lu
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 11:04 AM, H.J. Lu wrote: > Hi, > > I am working on 32bit Pmode for x32: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50797 > > It removes all LEAs, which convert 32bit address to 64bit, and uses 0x67 > address prefix instead.  I got 5% speed up in SPEC CPU 2K/2006. > > B

PATCH: Assert DWARF register size <= saved reg size

2011-11-11 Thread H.J. Lu
Hi, I am working on 32bit Pmode for x32: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50797 It removes all LEAs, which convert 32bit address to 64bit, and uses 0x67 address prefix instead. I got 5% speed up in SPEC CPU 2K/2006. But assert in _Unwind_SetGRValue: gcc_assert (dwarf_reg_size_table