r nvptx --
> which, I suppose, is OK, given that nvptx neither uses LRA nor doesn't
> use LRA. ;-) (Therefore, effective-target 'lra' shouldn't get used in
> test cases that are active for nvptx.)
>
> However, nvptx appears to support 'asm goto' with output
On 3/22/24 12:24 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 12:17:03PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
I'd just make target_lra return false for nvptx rather than creating a new
The lra effective target currently though doesn't check if asm goto can have
outputs, but rather if the target is us
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 12:17:03PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> I'd just make target_lra return false for nvptx rather than creating a new
The lra effective target currently though doesn't check if asm goto can have
outputs, but rather if the target is using lra.
> selector -- I'm not aware of any fe
vptx.)
However, nvptx appears to support 'asm goto' with outputs, including the
new execution test case:
PASS: gcc.dg/pr107385.c execution test
I'm attaching "[WIP] New effective-target 'asm_goto_with_outputs'", which
does address the effective-target
get used in
test cases that are active for nvptx.)
However, nvptx appears to support 'asm goto' with outputs, including the
new execution test case:
PASS: gcc.dg/pr107385.c execution test
I'm attaching "[WIP] New effective-target 'asm_goto_with_outputs'", whic
