Re: New Port for RISC-V v2

2017-02-05 Thread Richard Henderson
On 02/02/2017 01:05 AM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: Thanks to everyone who reviewed our original patch set. I've tried to CC everyone who provided a review, sorry if I missed anyone! Andrew, Kito and I believe that we've addressed almost all of the feedback from the reviews of our v1 patch set. Sinc

Re: New Port for RISC-V v2

2017-02-03 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Fri, 3 Feb 2017, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > How do these look? Fine for readings.html. backends.html, not my cup of tea. ;-) Gerald

Re: New Port for RISC-V v2

2017-02-03 Thread Palmer Dabbelt
On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 17:08:06 PST (-0800), Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 09:58:32 PST (-0800), jos...@codesourcery.com wrote: >> On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: >> >>> Additionally, here's a diff against wwwdocs. This is really just to check >>> this >>> is all I'm supposed

Re: New Port for RISC-V v2

2017-02-02 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > OK, thanks. As far as I know, I don't have write access to anything > yet. Should I request it from overse...@sourceware.org? I already have > binutils git access. Yes, and you can name me as your sponsor. Gerald

Re: New Port for RISC-V v2

2017-02-02 Thread Palmer Dabbelt
On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 13:07:25 PST (-0800), ger...@pfeifer.com wrote: > Hi Palmer, > > On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: >> Additionally, here's a diff against wwwdocs. This is really just to >> check this is all I'm supposed to do, I can submit a proper patch via >> the mailing list (I just

Re: New Port for RISC-V v2

2017-02-02 Thread Palmer Dabbelt
On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 09:58:32 PST (-0800), jos...@codesourcery.com wrote: > On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > >> Additionally, here's a diff against wwwdocs. This is really just to check >> this >> is all I'm supposed to do, I can submit a proper patch via the mailing list >> (I >> just

Re: New Port for RISC-V v2

2017-02-02 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
Hi Palmer, On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > Additionally, here's a diff against wwwdocs. This is really just to > check this is all I'm supposed to do, I can submit a proper patch via > the mailing list (I just don't know how to use CVS, sorry). > > Index: htdocs/gcc-7/changes.htm

Re: New Port for RISC-V v2

2017-02-02 Thread Joseph Myers
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > Additionally, here's a diff against wwwdocs. This is really just to check > this > is all I'm supposed to do, I can submit a proper patch via the mailing list (I > just don't know how to use CVS, sorry). Other parts of the wwwdocs changes (backends.ht

New Port for RISC-V v2

2017-02-02 Thread Palmer Dabbelt
Thanks to everyone who reviewed our original patch set. I've tried to CC everyone who provided a review, sorry if I missed anyone! Andrew, Kito and I believe that we've addressed almost all of the feedback from the reviews of our v1 patch set. Since it's been a while we wanted to get a v2 patch