On Mon, 2014-11-24 12:43:40 -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
[Merging top-level configury files from Binutils]
> It's pretty isolated stuff (in terms of what clauses are being
> changed in the configure bits), so I'm not too worried about
> breaking anything. We can reach out to Joel to ensure the RTEMS
>
On 11/24/14 09:52, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
On Mon, 2014-11-24 09:42:57 -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/23/14 00:31, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
This is my current patch series for GCC to merge all the config
bits from Binutils. It's not yet testet, but I'd like to post it
early to get feedback. Tha
On Mon, 2014-11-24 09:42:57 -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 11/23/14 00:31, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > This is my current patch series for GCC to merge all the config
> > bits from Binutils. It's not yet testet, but I'd like to post it
> > early to get feedback. That way, I hope to not forget someth
On 11/23/14 00:31, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
Hi!
This is my current patch series for GCC to merge all the config bits
from Binutils. It's not yet testet, but I'd like to post it early to
get feedback. That way, I hope to not forget something obvious.
FWIW, one could easily argue this should be a
Hi!
This is my current patch series for GCC to merge all the config bits
from Binutils. It's not yet testet, but I'd like to post it early to
get feedback. That way, I hope to not forget something obvious.
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw jbg...@lug-owl.de +49-172-7608481
S
