RE: Make profile estimation more precise

2020-01-20 Thread Tamar Christina
-iterations but doesn't seem to be what you're referring to? Thanks, Tamar > -Original Message- > From: Jan Hubicka > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2020 19:21 > To: Tamar Christina > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nd > Subject: Re: Make profile estimation more prec

Re: Make profile estimation more precise

2020-01-17 Thread Jan Hubicka
The logic above made us to predict initialization code to be hot and actual calculation to be cold. Honza > > Thanks, > Tamar > > > -Original Message- > > From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org > > On Behalf Of Jan Hubicka > > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2020 23:

RE: Make profile estimation more precise

2020-01-17 Thread Tamar Christina
Tamar > -Original Message- > From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org > On Behalf Of Jan Hubicka > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2020 23:00 > To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Make profile estimation more precise > > Hi, > while analyzing code size regression in SPE

Make profile estimation more precise

2020-01-16 Thread Jan Hubicka
Hi, while analyzing code size regression in SPEC2k GCC binary I noticed that we perform some inline decisions because we think that number of executions are very high. In particular there was inline decision inlining gen_rtx_fmt_ee to find_reloads believing that it is called 4 billion times. This