Jeff Law writes:
> On 01/24/14 01:24, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> Richard Sandiford writes:
>>> The other problem is related to the way that MIPS16 tests for equality.
>>> Conditional branches test register $24, and the only instructions that
>>> set $24 are MOVE and CMP(I), which is actually an
On 01/24/14 01:24, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Richard Sandiford writes:
The other problem is related to the way that MIPS16 tests for equality.
Conditional branches test register $24, and the only instructions that
set $24 are MOVE and CMP(I), which is actually an XOR rather than a
subtraction.
Richard Sandiford writes:
> The other problem is related to the way that MIPS16 tests for equality.
> Conditional branches test register $24, and the only instructions that
> set $24 are MOVE and CMP(I), which is actually an XOR rather than a
> subtraction.
Er, don't know what I was thinking here
This patch fixes gcc.dg/unroll_1.c for MIPS16. There were two problems,
one in the testcase itself and one in the rtl code.
The testcase problem was that gcc.dg/unroll_1.c forces loop2_unroll to
be run via -fenable-rtl-loop2_unroll but it doesn't explicitly force the
associated init pass (loop2)
