Re: Generalizing DejaGnu timeout scaling

2024-01-04 Thread Jacob Bachmeyer
Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: On Wed, 3 Jan 2024, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote: Comments before I start on an implementation? I'd suggest to await the conclusion of the debate: I *think* I've proved that dg-timeout-factor is already active as intended (all parts of a test), specifically when th

Re: Generalizing DejaGnu timeout scaling (was: Re: [PATCH DejaGNU/GCC 0/1] Support per-test execution timeout factor)

2024-01-03 Thread Hans-Peter Nilsson
On Wed, 3 Jan 2024, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote: > Comments before I start on an implementation? I'd suggest to await the conclusion of the debate: I *think* I've proved that dg-timeout-factor is already active as intended (all parts of a test), specifically when the compilation result is executed (f

Generalizing DejaGnu timeout scaling (was: Re: [PATCH DejaGNU/GCC 0/1] Support per-test execution timeout factor)

2024-01-03 Thread Jacob Bachmeyer
Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: On Wed, 3 Jan 2024, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: The test execution timeout is different from the tool execution timeout where it is GCC execution that is being guarded against taking excessive amount of time on the test host rather than the resulting test case execu