Hi Christophe
On 10/12/2019 09:01, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 9 Dec 2019 at 11:23, Sudakshina Das wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jeff
>>
>> On 07/12/2019 17:44, Jeff Law wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2019-12-06 at 14:05 +, Sudakshina Das wrote:
Hi
While looking at the vectorization for fo
Hi,
On Mon, 9 Dec 2019 at 11:23, Sudakshina Das wrote:
>
> Hi Jeff
>
> On 07/12/2019 17:44, Jeff Law wrote:
> > On Fri, 2019-12-06 at 14:05 +, Sudakshina Das wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> While looking at the vectorization for following example, we
> >> realized
> >> that even though vectorizable_
Hi Jeff
On 07/12/2019 17:44, Jeff Law wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-12-06 at 14:05 +, Sudakshina Das wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> While looking at the vectorization for following example, we
>> realized
>> that even though vectorizable_shift function was distinguishing
>> vector
>> shifted by vector from vector
On Fri, 2019-12-06 at 14:05 +, Sudakshina Das wrote:
> Hi
>
> While looking at the vectorization for following example, we
> realized
> that even though vectorizable_shift function was distinguishing
> vector
> shifted by vector from vector shifted by scalar, while modeling the
> cost
> it
Hi
While looking at the vectorization for following example, we realized
that even though vectorizable_shift function was distinguishing vector
shifted by vector from vector shifted by scalar, while modeling the cost
it would always add the cost of building a vector constant despite not
needin