Hi Thomas!
Am 30.12.23 um 12:08 schrieb Thomas Koenig:
Replying to myself...
I think this also desevers a mention in changes.html. Here is something
that I came up with. OK? Or does anybody have suggestions for a better
wording?
Or maybe this is better:
diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-14/change
Replying to myself...
I think this also desevers a mention in changes.html. Here is something
that I came up with. OK? Or does anybody have suggestions for a better
wording?
Or maybe this is better:
diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-14/changes.html b/htdocs/gcc-14/changes.html
index 4b83037a..d232f
Hi Rimvydas,
Documentation part.
The makeinfo gcc/fortran/gfortran.texi does not seem to have any new warnings.
Thanks for your work on this!
I think this also desevers a mention in changes.html. Here is something
that I came up with. OK? Or does anybody have suggestions for a better
wordin
Hi Rimvydas!
Am 28.12.23 um 08:09 schrieb Rimvydas Jasinskas:
On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 10:34 PM Harald Anlauf wrote:
The patch is almost fine, except for a strange wording here:
+@smallexample
+gfortran -save-temps -c foo.F90
+@end smallexample
+
+preprocesses to in @file{foo.fii}, compiles to
On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 10:34 PM Harald Anlauf wrote:
> The patch is almost fine, except for a strange wording here:
>
> +@smallexample
> +gfortran -save-temps -c foo.F90
> +@end smallexample
> +
> +preprocesses to in @file{foo.fii}, compiles to an intermediate
> +@file{foo.s}, and then assembles
Hi Rimvydas!
Am 24.12.23 um 02:33 schrieb Rimvydas Jasinskas:
Documentation part.
The makeinfo gcc/fortran/gfortran.texi does not seem to have any new warnings.
The patch is almost fine, except for a strange wording here:
+@smallexample
+gfortran -save-temps -c foo.F90
+@end smallexample
+
+p
Documentation part.
The makeinfo gcc/fortran/gfortran.texi does not seem to have any new warnings.
Is there a specific reason thy -fc-prototypes (Interoperability
Options section) is excluded from manpage?
Regards,
Rimvydas
From 3adb6cd8a2aa1576a8ff63b280239e725f1f112e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Fro
Am 20.12.23 um 05:32 schrieb Rimvydas Jasinskas:
Dear all,
In the spirit of c/c++ using the .i/.ii extensions for intermediates,
use the .fi/.fii intermediate extensions for gfortran fixed/free form
sources when -save-temps is invoked to avoid various issues.
I checked with Jerry on Mattermost
20 Dec 2023 03:39:33 +0000
Subject: Fortran: Use non conflicting file extensions for intermediates
[PR81615]
gcc/ChangeLog:
* doc/invoke.texi: Document the new file extensions
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
PR fortran/81615
* lang-specs.h (F951_CPP_OPTIONS): Do not hardcode ".f90" extens