On 13 January 2015 at 00:01, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Jan 11, 2015, at 2:33 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
>> oops, sorry about this. We will build further flattening patches with
>> --enable-languages=all,go,jit,ada.
>> Shall that cover all the front-ends ?
>
> No objc++ is non-default:
Thanks!
On Jan 11, 2015, at 2:33 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
> oops, sorry about this. We will build further flattening patches with
> --enable-languages=all,go,jit,ada.
> Shall that cover all the front-ends ?
No objc++ is non-default:
$ grep build_by_default */config-lang.in
go/config-lang.in:build
On 12 January 2015 at 16:24, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> I'm getting this testsuite regression:
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/plugin/ggcplug.c compilation
Fixed with r219458.
Thanks,
Prathamesh
>
> In file included from
> /usr/local/gcc/gcc-20150112/gcc/testsuite/../../gcc/tree.h:23:0,
> from
>
I'm getting this testsuite regression:
FAIL: gcc.dg/plugin/ggcplug.c compilation
In file included from
/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20150112/gcc/testsuite/../../gcc/tree.h:23:0,
from
/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20150112/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/plugin/ggcplug.c:8:
/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20150112/gcc/test
On Sat, 2015-01-10 01:50:42 +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
> On 9 January 2015 at 16:21, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Michael Collison
> > wrote:
> > > This patch flattens tree.h and tree-core.h. This is a revised
> > > patch that does not include tree-core.h a
On 10 January 2015 at 03:17, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-01-10 at 01:50 +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>> On 9 January 2015 at 16:21, Richard Biener
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Michael Collison
>> > wrote:
>> >> This patch flattens tree.h and tree-core.h. This is
On Sat, 2015-01-10 at 01:50 +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> On 9 January 2015 at 16:21, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Michael Collison
> > wrote:
> >> This patch flattens tree.h and tree-core.h. This is a revised patch that
> >> does not include tree-core.h as a r
On 10 January 2015 at 02:58, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 01:50:42AM +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>> >> I bootstrapped on x86 with all languages. I also bootstrapped on all
>> >> targets
>> >> listed in contrib/config-list.mk with c and c++ enabled.
>> >>
>> >> Is this okay
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 01:50:42AM +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> >> I bootstrapped on x86 with all languages. I also bootstrapped on all
> >> targets
> >> listed in contrib/config-list.mk with c and c++ enabled.
> >>
> >> Is this okay for trunk?
> >
> > Ok.
> Committed as r219402 on behalf o
On 9 January 2015 at 16:21, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Michael Collison
> wrote:
>> This patch flattens tree.h and tree-core.h. This is a revised patch that
>> does not include tree-core.h as a result of flattening.
>>
>> Version 3 of the patch adds the header files
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Michael Collison
wrote:
> This patch flattens tree.h and tree-core.h. This is a revised patch that
> does not include tree-core.h as a result of flattening.
>
> Version 3 of the patch adds the header files removed from tree-core.h to
> gcc-plugin.h in order to allo
This patch flattens tree.h and tree-core.h. This is a revised patch that
does not include tree-core.h as a result of flattening.
Version 3 of the patch adds the header files removed from tree-core.h to
gcc-plugin.h in order to allow ggc-common.c to compile. This is a recent
issue seen on trunk
Ping. Any update on this patch?
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-12/msg01848.html
--
Michael Collison
Linaro Toolchain Working Group
michael.colli...@linaro.org
This patch flattens tree.h and tree-core.h. This is a revised patch that
does not include tree-core.h as a result of flattening.
I removed the includes in tree.h and tree-core.h except for the include
of tree-core.h in tree.h.
I modified genattrtab.c, genautomata.c, genemit.c, gengtype.c,
ge
Andrew,
Yes it appears those are the three offenders. I like the approach of
moving them to fold-const.c and exporting from fold-const.h. I will try
that approach.
On 12/19/2014 02:10 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
On 12/19/2014 03:46 PM, Michael Collison wrote:
The reason I included tree-core.h
On 12/19/2014 03:46 PM, Michael Collison wrote:
The reason I included tree-core.h in all the .c files was the
requirement in tree.h (now flattened to the .c files) for
fold-const.h. In tree.h there are inline functions such as
fold_build_pointer_plus_hwi_loc which reference functions in
fold-c
On 20 December 2014 at 02:16, Michael Collison
wrote:
> The reason I included tree-core.h in all the .c files was the requirement in
> tree.h (now flattened to the .c files) for fold-const.h. In tree.h there are
> inline functions such as fold_build_pointer_plus_hwi_loc which reference
> functions
The reason I included tree-core.h in all the .c files was the
requirement in tree.h (now flattened to the .c files) for fold-const.h.
In tree.h there are inline functions such as
fold_build_pointer_plus_hwi_loc which reference functions in
fold-const.h. The moment you include fold-const.h you r
On 12/19/2014 01:12 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On December 19, 2014 2:44:00 PM CET, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
On 12/19/2014 06:20 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 1:37 AM, Michael Collison
wrote:
This patch flattens tree.h and tree-core.h. This work is part of the
GCC
Re-Archi
On December 19, 2014 2:44:00 PM CET, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>On 12/19/2014 06:20 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 1:37 AM, Michael Collison
>> wrote:
>>> This patch flattens tree.h and tree-core.h. This work is part of the
>GCC
>>> Re-Architecture effort being led by Andrew Ma
On 12/19/2014 08:44 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
On 12/19/2014 06:20 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 1:37 AM, Michael Collison
wrote:
This patch flattens tree.h and tree-core.h. This work is part of the
GCC
Re-Architecture effort being led by Andrew MacLeod.
I removed the inc
On 12/19/2014 06:20 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 1:37 AM, Michael Collison
wrote:
This patch flattens tree.h and tree-core.h. This work is part of the GCC
Re-Architecture effort being led by Andrew MacLeod.
I removed the includes in tree.h and tree-core.h except for the i
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 1:37 AM, Michael Collison
wrote:
> This patch flattens tree.h and tree-core.h. This work is part of the GCC
> Re-Architecture effort being led by Andrew MacLeod.
>
> I removed the includes in tree.h and tree-core.h except for the include of
> tree-core.h in tree.h.
>
> I mo
This patch flattens tree.h and tree-core.h. This work is part of the GCC
Re-Architecture effort being led by Andrew MacLeod.
I removed the includes in tree.h and tree-core.h except for the include
of tree-core.h in tree.h.
I modified genattrtab.c, genautomata.c, genemit.c, gengtype.c,
gengty
24 matches
Mail list logo
