On 10/16/14 06:40, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
(I've taken Alan's patch and added two new testcases.)
This patch cures the linux kernel boot failure when compiled using
trunk gcc.
At its heart, the problem is caused by merge_decls merging from the
old decl to the new decl, then copying back to t
On 10/15/14 22:51, Alan Modra wrote:
Target independent tests are always best, but pulling together one that is
specific to a target is usually still good enough. Especially if it's an
x86 target given how often those are tested by the developer community as a
whole.
I think for #1 in your post
(I've taken Alan's patch and added two new testcases.)
This patch cures the linux kernel boot failure when compiled using
trunk gcc.
At its heart, the problem is caused by merge_decls merging from the
old decl to the new decl, then copying back to the old decl and
discarding the new. When Jan m
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:02:25PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 09/16/14 00:03, Alan Modra wrote:
> >gcc testsuite additions? I decline. It is too soon. If you had read
> >my patch submission you'll see that at some stage gcc was supposed to
> >warn on conflicting section attributes, but hasn't d
On 09/16/14 00:03, Alan Modra wrote:
gcc testsuite additions? I decline. It is too soon. If you had read
my patch submission you'll see that at some stage gcc was supposed to
warn on conflicting section attributes, but hasn't done so for a very
long time. There needs to be some agreement on w
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 01:03:50PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> The point of testsuite additions is to verify the visible changes in
Understood. A long time ago I worked on mil-spec systems..
> > Come to think of it, what if I decline to make any testsuite
> > additions?
>
> Then the patch
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Alan Modra wrote:
> gcc testsuite additions? I decline. It is too soon. If you had read
> my patch submission you'll see that at some stage gcc was supposed to
> warn on conflicting section attributes, but hasn't done so for a very
> long time. There needs to be some agree
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 08:36:58PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Sep 2014, Alan Modra wrote:
>
> > This patch cures the linux kernel boot failure when compiled using
> > trunk gcc. (Andrew, apologies for hijacking your bugzilla, I started
> > work on this before finding the bugzilla.
On Mon, 15 Sep 2014, Alan Modra wrote:
> This patch cures the linux kernel boot failure when compiled using
> trunk gcc. (Andrew, apologies for hijacking your bugzilla, I started
> work on this before finding the bugzilla..)
Please include testcases in your patch for each case that you fix.
--
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
> This patch cures the linux kernel boot failure when compiled using
> trunk gcc. (Andrew, apologies for hijacking your bugzilla, I started
> work on this before finding the bugzilla..)
It is ok that you took over as it looks like you have a mor
This patch cures the linux kernel boot failure when compiled using
trunk gcc. (Andrew, apologies for hijacking your bugzilla, I started
work on this before finding the bugzilla..)
At its heart, the problem is caused by merge_decls merging from the
old decl to the new decl, then copying back to th
11 matches
Mail list logo
