On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 06:52:55PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
> Ping.
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 06:10:27PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > Here, a missing -Wimplicit-fallthrough warning was caused by a misplaced
> > FALLTHROUGH_LABEL_P check. As it is now, for FALLTHROUGH_LABEL_P we'd
> > neve
Ping.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 06:10:27PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
> Here, a missing -Wimplicit-fallthrough warning was caused by a misplaced
> FALLTHROUGH_LABEL_P check. As it is now, for FALLTHROUGH_LABEL_P we'd
> never gotten around to
> 1933 /* So that next warn_implicit_fallth
Here, a missing -Wimplicit-fallthrough warning was caused by a misplaced
FALLTHROUGH_LABEL_P check. As it is now, for FALLTHROUGH_LABEL_P we'd
never gotten around to
1933 /* So that next warn_implicit_fallthrough_r will start
looking for
1934a new sequence starting w
