On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 8:33 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> With the last two fixes, the only remaining i686 regression
> from Thursday is 1 fortran testcase, whose number I have
> misplaced. This highlights an accidental change I made while
> moving code around between functions, and an assertio
With the last two fixes, the only remaining i686 regression
from Thursday is 1 fortran testcase, whose number I have
misplaced. This highlights an accidental change I made while
moving code around between functions, and an assertion I
added trying to see if we'd Done The Right Thing already.
Th
As a follow-up, by inspection, args_size should be zeroed across
edges for which we explicitly undo args_size, like EH. But we
do the same thing for non-local gotos and computed gotos.
I couldn't see any difference in the test results with this
patch, and frankly I'm surprised about that. But,
Tested on i686-linux. I'm not sure how I missed this with {,-m32}
testing on x86_64.
r~
PR debug/49825
* dwarf2cfi.c (cfi_row_equal_p): Don't compare args_size.
diff --git a/gcc/dwarf2cfi.c b/gcc/dwarf2cfi.c
index 3ff4c61..f715e07 100644
--- a/gcc/dwarf2cfi.c
+++ b/gcc/dwarf2
