On 09/15/2017 04:49 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> The vectoriser was calling vect_get_smallest_scalar_type without
> having proven that the type actually is a scalar. This seems to
> be the intended behaviour: the ultimate test of whether the type
> is interesting (and hence scalar) is whether an
The vectoriser was calling vect_get_smallest_scalar_type without
having proven that the type actually is a scalar. This seems to
be the intended behaviour: the ultimate test of whether the type
is interesting (and hence scalar) is whether an associated vector
type exists, but this is only tested l
