This causes a bootstrap failure for me.
PR/101959
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 5:00 AM Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 8:40 AM Thomas Schwinge
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > On 2021-08-16T14:10:00-0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> > > On 8/16/21 6:44 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>
Hi!
On 2021-08-17T10:57:36+0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 8:40 AM Thomas Schwinge
> wrote:
>> On 2021-08-16T14:10:00-0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
>> > On 8/16/21 6:44 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>> >> [...], to document the current behavior, I propose to
>> >> "Add more self
On 8/17/21 12:40 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Hi!
On 2021-08-16T14:10:00-0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 8/16/21 6:44 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
[...], to document the current behavior, I propose to
"Add more self-tests for 'hash_map' with Value type with non-trivial
constructor/destructor", see a
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 8:40 AM Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> On 2021-08-16T14:10:00-0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> > On 8/16/21 6:44 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> >> [...], to document the current behavior, I propose to
> >> "Add more self-tests for 'hash_map' with Value type with non-trivial
>
Hi!
On 2021-08-16T14:10:00-0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 8/16/21 6:44 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>> [...], to document the current behavior, I propose to
>> "Add more self-tests for 'hash_map' with Value type with non-trivial
>> constructor/destructor", see attached. OK to push to master branch
/daten/gcc/gcc-20180101/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/plugin/expensive_selftests_plugin.c:175:1:
warning: no return statement in function returning non-void [-Wreturn-type]
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now
ount of coverage, but
> the test seems useful, and there seems to be a valid role for "torture"
> selftests.
>
> Hence this patch adds a:
> gcc.dg/plugin/expensive_selftests_plugin.c
> with the responsibility for running "expensive" selftests, and adds the
>
nacceptable amount of overhead to
> add.
>
> I attempted to optimize the test by reducing the amount of coverage,
> but
> the test seems useful, and there seems to be a valid role for
> "torture"
> selftests.
>
> Hence this patch adds a:
> gcc.dg/plug
Hence this patch adds a:
gcc.dg/plugin/expensive_selftests_plugin.c
with the responsibility for running "expensive" selftests, and adds the
expensive test there. The patch moves a small amount of code from
selftest::run_tests into a helper class so that the plugin can print
a useful summary line (to
