On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 07:50:02PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Hi Jakub,
>
> On Wednesday 2014-11-12 14:13, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > This patch mentions __builtin_*_overflow in gcc-5/changes.html.
> > Ok for CVS?
>
> I've fallen a bit behind with GCC patches, sorry.
>
> What do you think abou
Hi Jakub,
On Wednesday 2014-11-12 14:13, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> This patch mentions __builtin_*_overflow in gcc-5/changes.html.
> Ok for CVS?
I've fallen a bit behind with GCC patches, sorry.
What do you think about this follow-up patch on top of yours?
Gerald
Index: changes.html
=
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 03:39:25PM +0100, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>
> > On 12 Nov 2014, at 14:13, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > + size_t sz;
> > + if (__builtin_mul_overflow (x, y, &sz)
>
> Missing right parenthesis ?
Thanks, fixed.
Jakub
> On 12 Nov 2014, at 14:13, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> + size_t sz;
> + if (__builtin_mul_overflow (x, y, &sz)
Missing right parenthesis ?
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This patch mentions __builtin_*_overflow in gcc-5/changes.html.
> Ok for CVS?
Ok.
Thanks,
Richard.
> --- gcc-5/changes.html 27 Oct 2014 18:05:26 - 1.20
> +++ gcc-5/changes.html 12 Nov 2014 13:09:01 -
> @@ -84,7 +84,3
Hi!
This patch mentions __builtin_*_overflow in gcc-5/changes.html.
Ok for CVS?
--- gcc-5/changes.html 27 Oct 2014 18:05:26 - 1.20
+++ gcc-5/changes.html 12 Nov 2014 13:09:01 -
@@ -84,7 +84,36 @@
of the standard directive #include
and the extension #include_next r
