Hi,
On 10/24/2013 09:22 PM, François Dumont wrote:
Ok to commit ?
Looks great to me.
Thanks!
Paolo.
On 10/24/2013 12:12 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 10/23/2013 11:22 PM, François Dumont wrote:
You are right, I am preparing a test case. However you have to know
that __check_dereferenceable is simply not used for the moment. It is
only because I have started using it for a debug mode evolution t
On 10/23/2013 11:22 PM, François Dumont wrote:
You are right, I am preparing a test case. However you have to know
that __check_dereferenceable is simply not used for the moment. It is
only because I have started using it for a debug mode evolution that I
discovered the issue.
Ok, thanks. Now h
On 10/23/2013 12:37 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
"François Dumont" ha scritto:
Hi
Here is a patch to clean up a little some debug functions. I got
rid of the __check_singular_aux, simply playing with __check_singular
overloads was enough. I also added the missing __check_dereferenceable
Hi,
"François Dumont" ha scritto:
>Hi
>
> Here is a patch to clean up a little some debug functions. I got
>rid of the __check_singular_aux, simply playing with __check_singular
>overloads was enough. I also added the missing __check_dereferenceable
>for safe local iterators.
This is proba
Hi
Here is a patch to clean up a little some debug functions. I got
rid of the __check_singular_aux, simply playing with __check_singular
overloads was enough. I also added the missing __check_dereferenceable
for safe local iterators.
2013-10-22 François Dumont
* include/debug/for
