> Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 19:36:47 +0300
> From: Janne Blomqvist
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 00:52, Hans-Peter Nilsson
> wrote:
> > This time, it happened in 173155:173168.
> >
> > Usually, there's also a brief question whether all changes were
> > intended, or perhaps that some of the regressing tes
On May 5, 2011, at 9:36 AM, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> The testsuite uses the process return value to determine
> success, right? But which values exactly constitute success
> vs. failure?
0 is success, and != 0 is failure.
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 00:52, Hans-Peter Nilsson
wrote:
> Once or twice a year some regression results from changed I/O
> in libgfortran, such that some existing test-case starts
> calling libgfortran/io/unix.c:raw_truncate, which on
> limited-I/O-bare-iron targets will emit "required ftruncate or
Once or twice a year some regression results from changed I/O
in libgfortran, such that some existing test-case starts
calling libgfortran/io/unix.c:raw_truncate, which on
limited-I/O-bare-iron targets will emit "required ftruncate or
chsize support not present" and fail. After a while, I get to
i
