> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
> >>
> >> modify ALL_LINKERFLAGS or BUILD_LINKERFLAGS?
> >
> > configure --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto . You need plugin enabled
> > buinutils for that.
> > I think there however should be a lot easier way to reproduce it by just
> > d
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>>
>> modify ALL_LINKERFLAGS or BUILD_LINKERFLAGS?
>
> configure --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto . You need plugin enabled
> buinutils for that.
> I think there however should be a lot easier way to reproduce it by just
> dropping some reall
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> > it seems to be couple weeks I am not able to compile big ltrans unit
>> >> > with -fdump-tree-all
>> >> > beca
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> > it seems to be couple weeks I am not able to compile big ltrans unit
> >> > with -fdump-tree-all
> >> > because the compiler eventually runs out of memory. I think it
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > it seems to be couple weeks I am not able to compile big ltrans unit with
>> > -fdump-tree-all
>> > because the compiler eventually runs out of memory. I think it is one of
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > Hi,
> > it seems to be couple weeks I am not able to compile big ltrans unit with
> > -fdump-tree-all
> > because the compiler eventually runs out of memory. I think it is one of
> > your patches
> > introducing serious memory leak. Can
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Hi,
> it seems to be couple weeks I am not able to compile big ltrans unit with
> -fdump-tree-all
> because the compiler eventually runs out of memory. I think it is one of
> your patches
> introducing serious memory leak. Can you, please,
Hi,
it seems to be couple weeks I am not able to compile big ltrans unit with
-fdump-tree-all
because the compiler eventually runs out of memory. I think it is one of your
patches
introducing serious memory leak. Can you, please, take a look on this? It
makes my life
harder - it is not fun to
On 08/26/2013 11:20 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
You need more than that. The rest of patch is in trunk now.
Sorry for the breakage -- as you probably guessed, I specified only
c-family directory on the commit command line.
Thanks!
Paolo.
Paolo Carlini writes:
| Hi Gaby,
|
| bootstrap is currently broken:
|
| /scratch/Gcc/svn-dirs/trunk/gcc/c/c-objc-common.c: In function ‘bool
| c_tree_printer(pretty_printer*, text_info*, const char*, int, bool,
| bool, bool)’:
| /scratch/Gcc/svn-dirs/trunk/gcc/c/c-objc-common.c:123:31: error:
|
Paolo Carlini writes:
| Hi Gaby.
|
| On 08/26/2013 10:42 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > Same topic as patch 17/n. For more expressing printers.
| > Tested on an x86_64-suse-linux. Applied to mainline.
| Just got this:
|
| /scratch/Gcc/svn-dirs/trunk/gcc/c/c-objc-common.c: In function ‘bool
|
Hi Gaby,
bootstrap is currently broken:
/scratch/Gcc/svn-dirs/trunk/gcc/c/c-objc-common.c: In function ‘bool
c_tree_printer(pretty_printer*, text_info*, const char*, int, bool,
bool, bool)’:
/scratch/Gcc/svn-dirs/trunk/gcc/c/c-objc-common.c:123:31: error:
‘pp_c_expression’ was not declared in
Same topic as patch 17/n. For more expressing printers.
Tested on an x86_64-suse-linux. Applied to mainline.
-- Gaby
2013-08-26 Gabriel Dos Reis
c-family/
* c-pretty-print.h (c_pretty_printer::unary_expression): Now a
virtual member function.
(c_pretty_printer::mult
13 matches
Mail list logo
